These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
379 stories in Sydney's papers · page 15 of 19
In this case, an information was filed by the ATTORNEY GENERAL, for a libel contained in a certain article which appeared in the Australian newspaper, on the 30th day of…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →WENTWORTH v. KING.—Mr. Justice opened the plendi[?]gs. Mr. Talfourd stated the case. The plaintiff, Miss Mary Wentworth, was a most highly respectably…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →His Majesty held a Court, yesterday afternoon, at two o'clock, at his Palace in St. James's, which was attended by the Lord Chancellor, the Lord President of the Council, the First Lord of the Treasury, the…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is a Stockbroker in the city of London, to recover from the defendants, who are the proprietor and printer of the…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Mr. W. H. MOORE st[?]ted the case. This was an action on the part of the Crown, against the defendant, Mr. E. S. Hall, the Editor, Pr[?]ter, and Publisher of the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →A Court of Common Council was held this day, which was the most numerously attended of any that has taken place for a considerable time. The reason of this attendance was, an expected motion to come…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Edmund Pinckes was charged with having stolen sundry articles of wearing apparel, the property of a poor man having a large family, at Richmond. The prosecutor had received tidings of the probability of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action for libel. The damage were lai[?] at £100. Dr. Wardell stated the c[?]e. The plaintiff in this action, was Mr. Thomas H[?]rton James, a gentleman well…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →THE KING V. BRADLEY.—The Attorney General moved for a rule, calling upon the defendant, late Lieut.-Colonel of the 2d West India Regiment, to show cause why a…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Doctor Warded opened the proceedings. This was an Action, for Libel, brought by Thomas Horton James, against Doctor Halloran, the Editor of The Gleaner Weekly…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →FRIDAY, SEPT. 21s, 1827.—John Goff, William Moore, and Edward Watson, were indicted for the wilful murder of Robert Wilson, a Corporal in H. M. 57th Reg ment…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is a police reporter, against the defendant, who is proprietor of the Morning Chronicle and Bell's Life in…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Shortly after Their HONORS, the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stephen, had taken their seats upon the Bench, this morning, J. T. Gellibrand, Esq. prayed to be…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Mr. Sergeant Cross prayed the judgment of the Court upon the defendants, who were convicted at the last Assizes for Lancaster, before Mr. Baron Hullock, of a conspiracy, by means of a forged letter, to carry…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →THE INHABITANTS OF SYDNEY, and of the Districts, in it's Vicinity, are hereby informed, that the Bench of Magistrates have received from the COLONIAL…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was a Criminal Information filed, by the Attorney-General against the defendant, as the Editor and Proprietor of The Australian Newspaper, for printing and publishing a seditious libel in that paper, on the 3d of August last…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →An information was presented by His Majesty's Attorney General, charging the defendant, Robert Wardell, L. L. D. with printing and publishing, in the Australian…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1827.—Elizabeth M'Donald, of the Colony of New South Wales, for that she [?]ath no settled home or habitation, was brought before the…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →SATURDAY, 1st SEPT. 1827.—Daniel Boswell was charged with neglect of duty, by suffering the cattle, in his care, to [?]tray away and depasture in the crops, in the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Mr. Sergeant Wil [?]e stated the case. The plaintiff was a journey man h[?]tter. The defendant, a surgeon, in Duke street, Westminster. The plaintiff was married in 1819,…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →