Supreme Court.—(civil Side.)
Mr. Justice Stephen was the presiding Judge to day. Messrs Walker and D'Arcy were the Assessors. Kelly v. M'Vitle, Esq. Managing Director…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Courts & crime, 1830
230 stories in Sydney's papers · page 4 of 12
Supreme Court. Wednesday In Banco Regis
Mr. Justice Stephen and Mr. Justice Dowling took their seats at the usual hour his morning. Mr. Chief Justice Forbes being still absent through indisposition…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Important Decisions This Week in the Supreme Court
The Editor of this Journal has been prosecuted in different ways, ten times within the last eighteen months, by the express order of the General. His Excellency having now got through his list, it at…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Thursday, April 1. (Before Mr. Justice DOWLING and a Special Jury.) Hall v. Mansfield
This was an action of trespass on the case, brought by the plai[?]ti[?], Mr. E. S. Hall, Editor of the Sydney Monitor news— per, against the defendant, the Editor of…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court. Yesterday
Mr. Justice Dowling sat to day, with a Special Jury, consisting of Messrs Pitman, (foreman) Symonds, Terry, Pritchett, Maclaren, R. Cooper, Maziere, Chisholm, Rickards…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →ANOTHER. Hall v. Mansfield. Supreme Court.—saturday
This case being also, an action of trespass for an alleged libel, published by the defendant in the Sydney Gazette, of March 19, 1829. was tried before the Judge and Jury of the previous day, with…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Case of Libel. [Supreme Court.—thursday.] Hall V. Mansfield
Owing to the verdict of the Jury in this case not being delivered when our Friday's publication went to press, we omitted to mention, in our last the conclusion…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Another Libel Case. Supreme Court—friday. Hall V. Mansfield
The new Court House being still under repairs, and the old one occupied for criminal business, the Civil Court adjourned to the Wesleyan Chapel, Macquarie-street…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →To that independent and noble-minded member of the Legislative Council, who ventured to oppose the Press-restriction Bill, and who was obliged to appeal to his brother Members for their support and countenance, when he was reproved by the General for such his opposition, nobly observing. "that he was bound rather to attend to his oath as a council-man, than to 'His Excellency's pleasure.' " His Majesty's Gaol, April-fuel day, 1830
SIR, I perceive that by one of the [?]lau[?] of the proposed bill for preventing "liquors" from being drunk by the inmates of this sweet…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →(The following is a copy of the letter which, on the motion Mr. Hely (Superintendent of convicts), for an information for libel, was read by our Counsel, and which, with other mitigating circumstances, caused the Judges to say, that if they were sitting in a Court of King's Bench, uccording to English law, would prevent their granting such information. Ed.) Sydney, 11th March, 1829
SIR, You have done me the honour, I perceive, to give me under my official designation, a place in the columns of your paper of the 9th instant-in- stating…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Supreme Court. Hall v. Mansfield. (Continued from our last.)
The strongest proof how little he cares for impugning the conduct and motives of others. Gentlemen, I ask you to try him by his own law, and not permit him to blow hot to-day and cold to-morrow…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court
There being no criminal business pending to-day. Mr. Justice Dowling took his seat in the old Court House, Castlereagh-street, when…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Horrid Murder. [From a Correspondent.]
On Sunday afternoon last, word was sent by Captain L[?]THBRIDGE to a person named Kenny (formerly a constable, but has lately done no duty, on account of some very severe wounds he…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court. (Before Mr. Justice DOWLING and a Special Jury.) Tuesday, April 6. Hall v. Scott
This was an action of trespass, brought by the plaintiff, Mr. E. S. Hall, against the defendant, the Rev. Thomas Hobbes Scott, late Archdeacon of New South Wales. The damages were laid at £100.—…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court. (Before Mr. Justice DOWLING and a Special Jury.) Tuesday, April 6. Hall v. Scott
Mr. Justico T. [?] LING summed up this case for the Jury in substance as follows:— GENETLEMEN OF THE JURY:— I could have wished most heartily that the duty…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court
'his being Good Friday, there was no business [?] SATURDAY. Mr. Justice Dowling was the sitting Judge…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court. Saturday, April, 10, 1830
It will be in the recollection of the public, that a few days previous to the close of the lost Term, it was found necessary, for the purpose of trying some criminal cases, to hold two Courts, and that…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Court of Requests
SLATTERY v. TUBBS—Mr. Nicholas Tubbs appeared before the Commissioners upon summons, to show cause why he refused or neglected to pay the the sum of £l 17s 6d. being the ballance of an…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →The Right Honourable Sir George Murray, K. C. B. G. C. B. His Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Colonies, &C. &C. &C. H. M. Gaol, Sudney, New South Wales April 13th, 1830
SIR, By the merchant ship June, which left this in January last, I I transmitted a Petition to the Honourable the House of…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →English Law Intelligence. Important Case. Court of King's Bench. Law of Protest
Mitchell and Co. v. Baring and others.—The circumstances of this new and important case were fully given when it came before the Court at the last sittings at Guildhall. A £500 bill was drawn…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →