Law. Supreme Court.—(in Equity.)
FRIDAY.—Before Mr Justice Wullis. Blackman v. Challener and Others.—This was an amicable application for leave to foreclose. [?] Willis said this is a bill of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
608 stories in Sydney's papers · page 17 of 31
FRIDAY.—Before Mr Justice Wullis. Blackman v. Challener and Others.—This was an amicable application for leave to foreclose. [?] Willis said this is a bill of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Levy v. Holt.—This was an action on n bond of replevin. The defendant justified the taking, on the ground that he acted as the bail[?]ff of Daniel Cooper. Mr. Barnet…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Briggs v. Humphrey.—This was an action to recover £151 for work and labour done. The plaintiff occupied n house belonging to the defendant, and it was agreed that a certain por[?]on of the…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Francis Burns, a gentleman possessing a very pretty thin metallic voice, something like a teakettle, if it could find a voice. was charged with dancing and singing in George-street. on Sunday…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →We understand that an order has been sent out by the British Government that the Colonists shall, in future, pay the forage expenses of the mounted police which have hitherto been defrayed…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Before Mr. Justice Burton and a common Jury. Callashan v. Macquoid—This was an action brought by a resident of Maitland, to recover for an illegal seizure made on the plaintiff's premises. The actual…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Mr. William Hedney, schoolmaster in York-street, appeared by summons to answer a charge of assault preferred against him by a Mr. Brinkley, father to…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY.âBefore his Honor Mr Justice Burton, and a Common Jury. Burton V. White and another.âThis was an action for slander; the damages laid at £500…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →February 21.—Before Lord Denman.—The Attorney General, Sir F. Pollock, Mr. Richards, and Mr. Swann, conducted the plaintiff's case; and Sir W…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →The Attorney General moved that the rule which had been issued calling upon Mr. Rowe to show cause why an attachment should not be issued against him be made absolute…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SIR, Having under our consideration the state of the Law respecting Debtors and Creditors in this Colony, to which our attention has lately been most…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Ex-parte Glover v. Macquinan. In this case Mrs. Glover appeared through her solicitor, Mr. Thurlow, to shew cause why Mrs. Macquinan (or some euphonea to that effect) should not be…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →SATURDAY, JUNE 30 -- Before their Honors, the Judges, in Banco. In the case of the Queen v. T. D. Howe, Mr. Therry, for the defendant, appeared to shew…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →MONDAY, JULY 2.—Before Mr. Justice Willis, and a Special Jury. O'Reilly v. Hall.—This was an action of libel, damages laid at £1,000. The plaintiff is an…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →IN BANCO,—Before their Honours the three Judges. The Queen v. T. D. Rowe.—The Attorney General moved that the rule made in this case should be…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Bernard Rochford, holding a ticket-of-leave for the district of Yass, and lately residing in York-street, was charged with fraud under the following circumstances…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →MONDAY—Before Mr Justice Willis. On the opening of the court, the case of O'Reilly v Hall was called on; His Honor Mr Justice Willis suggested that this cause, which was…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WE have been requested to state that great inconvenience is felt by the civil jurors summoned to the Court of Quarter Sessions. A new panel is called every…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →O'Reilly, Gent, .one, &c. v. Hall. -- This was an action brought by the plaintiff', a Solicitor of the Supreme Court, to recover a compensation in damages from the defendant, who is Editor…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY, JULY 5—Before Mr. Justice Willis, and a Special Jury. Bullivant v Ikin,—This was an action of ejectment, brought to obtain possession of a…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →