These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
815 stories in Sydney's papers · page 21 of 41
INDENTED APPRENTICE.—Francis Jones, an indented apprentice to Mr Francis Harringtoun of Sussex-street, Carpenter, summoned his master to shew cause why his articles of apprenticeship entered into…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →John Terry Hughes v. Mary Kenny, Thomas Hannon, and other—Mr Forster moved the Court for an injunction against the defendants, to restrain them from selling certain land and stock advertised…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Exparte Hughes.—An application was made the Court by Mr. Foster on behalf of Mr. J. Hughes, for an injunction against Thomas [?] mond and others, to prevant them from selling…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SATURDAY, JUNE 15.--Sullivan and Jordan, the Goat Island runaways were brought before the Bench, changed with, attempting to leave the colony. Remanded…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →We have no doubt but Mr. Commissioner Therry is a truly impartial judge, in adjudicating cases brought before him in this Court; but we think that like in days…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Mr. William Rafter, senior, appeared before his Worship for drunkenness. Being his fourth conviction since the 1st of January, the worthy magistrate, finding that…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →The lists have of late been made up principally of drunkards, and the offences consequent on that offence. The greater part of petty offenders being now safely lodged, and awaiting the Quarter…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →MONDAY,—Before Mr. Justice Stephen; and Messrs. Manning and J. Lord, Assessors. Bellamy v. Taylor and Webb. This was an action of trespass. The plaintiff and defendant…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →My principal motive in addressing you is, [?] idea that through the medium of your [?] Journal, the subject may arrest [?] of the Government, who may take it…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →WALKER AND ANOTHER V. HUGHES.—A Verdict had been given for the Plaintiff in this case last term. The action was to recover compensation for a breach of contract. On Saturday week last, Mr…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Mr. Martin applied for a rule, calling upon a person named Hall, an attorney at Manchester, to show cause why he should not be struck off the roll of attorneys for having allowed a person named…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →A Court of Oyer and Terminer and Ge[?] Gaol Delivery was held here on Tuesday, Wed[?] day and Thursday, before His Honor Cha[?] Cooper, Esq., Chief Judge of the Province…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Monday.—Before Mr Justice Stephen; and Messrs Manningd and J. Lord, Assessors. Bellamy v. Taylor and Webb. This was an [?] The plaintiff and defendant…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Bellamy v. Taylor and Webb. This was an action of trespass. The plaintiff and defendant Webb are settlers in the district of Pennant Hills, and the defendant Taylor is a general agent residing…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →GOAT ISLAND RUNAWAYS.— Sullivan and Jordan, the two last of the six convicts who escaped from Goat Island and were captured on board the Francis Spaight. were…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY.—Before Mr Justice Stephen, and Messrs Shadforth and Ryder, Assessors. Hart v Lindley—This was an action for work and labour. The plaintiff, a ropemaker, was…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Cave and Another v. Woife.—This was an undefended action to recover £47 7s 5d being a balance of an account for goods sold and delivered. Verdict for the plaintiff…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Inglis v. Hogan.—The plaintiff is a land and sheep holder, in the district of Burrogarang, and the defendant a small settler, who leases some land from the Government in the neighbourhood. This…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →THURSDAY, JUNE 20.--Thomas Ritchie, private in the 50th Regiment, was put to the bar, charged with stealing a half-crown from a sailor, named Charles M'Lean, in Mr. Moore's…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY.—Before Mr Justice Stephen and Messrs Shadforth and Ryder. Assessors. Hart v. Lindley.—This was an action brought to recover £111 for work and labour done and…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →