Supreme Court—civil Side
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26.—Before the Chief Justice and Messrs. Manning and Myles, Assessors. Most of the causes set down to-day were on promissory notes, to which there were no defence…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Courts & crime, 1839
815 stories in Sydney's papers · page 8 of 41
Supreme Court. Civil Side. Monday, 4th MARCH, 1839
Before Mr. Justice Willis and Messrs. A. B. Spark and Verner, assessors. Terry (widow) v. Lamb.—This was an action for the recovery of £60 the amount of a promissory…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court—Civil Side. Monday, March 4, 1839. (Before Mr. Ju[?]tice Willis, and Messrs. A. B, Spark and Verner, Ass[?]ors)
Terry v. Lamb.—This was an action to recover the value of a promissory note. The defendant had given a bill to the late Mr. S. Terry; after the note had become due the amount [?]ad been…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Police News. Tuesday, March 5
INEFFICIENCY OF THE MERCHANTS' SEAMAN'S ACT. CAPTAIN METCALF'S CREW AGAIN.—Henry Haimes, an articled seaman, belonging to the Francer Charlotte, was apprehended on warrant by…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court—civil Side
WEDNESDAY, March 6, 1839.—Before Mr. Justice Willis and Messrs. Forster and J Lord. Ross v. Frazer.—This was an action for trespass, arising out of a dispute respecting the case of the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Civil Side. Before Mr Justice Willis, and Messrs Johnson and Gosling, assessors
Long v. Stephen.—This was an action brought by Mr. Long, merchant, against Mr. Sydney Stephen. and arose out of the insolvency of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's books had been badly kept, and the defendant kad not bren…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Court of Requests
FRIDAY, MARCH 8--M'Grath v. Eagling.--This was a case the most preposterous that ever was heard in any Court. M'Grath, a man living in Prince-street, stated that he had…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law. Supreme Court.—(civil Side.)
MONDAYâBefore Mr Justice Willis and Messrs Spark under Verner, Assessors. Terry v. Lamb.âThis was on action brought to recover on a promissory note for £60 drawn…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court—Civil Side. Wednesday, March 6, 1839. (Fefore Mr. Justice Willis, and Messrs, Lord and Foster, Assessors.)
Ross v. Frazer.—This was an action for trepass; a stet processus was entered by consent. Ross v. Haydon.—This was a similar action, and settled in the same manner…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Court of Vice-admiralty
FRIDAY.—Before His Honor the Judge. The Governor Bourke.—In this case a motion had been issued, calling upon Mr. J. H. Grose to show cause why an attachment should…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court—civil Side
SATURDAY, MARCH 9, 1839.—In Banco.—Before the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Willis. Watkins v. Titterton.—In this case an injunction had been granted on an a[?]davit setting forth…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law. Supreme Court—(in Banco.)
SATURDAY.—Before His Honor the Chief Justice And Mr Justice Willis. Samuel v. Newsham.—Im this case, a rule to shew cause why an Attachment should not issue…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SUPREME COURT—Clvil Side. Saturday, March 9, 1839. (Before the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Willis, in Banco.)
Titterton v. Watkins.—This was an application to have the injunction, which had been granted in this case, to prevent the defendant from using certain stage coach's, dissolved. The defendant put…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Police News
Parties in the habit of coming with frivolous complaints to the Police-office, in future will be informed that unless they can swear that they are in fear of a violent assault, they will not be…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Police Incidents
ASSAULT.--A few days ago, two ladies with spirits as hot as the "fiery unknown deep," appeared before the Bench. Ann Haynes against Mary Ryan, and sons Edward and Thomas…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court—civil Side
MONDAY, MARCH 11, 1839.—Before Chief Justice Sir James Dowling, and Messrs. Lethbridge anti Kinnear. Brownlow v. Humphrey.—This was an…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Civil Side. Monday, 11Th March, 1839. Before Sir James Dowling, Chief Justice, and Messrs Kinnear and Lethbridge assessors
This was the last day for assessor's cases, and there were several set down. Principally actions on promissory notes. Brownlow v. Humphrey. Undefended, verdict…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Advance Australia Sydney Gazette. Thursday, March 14, 18[?]9. The First Police Magistrate
Doubtless Colonel Wilson is an ill-used man—the Colonel himself says, or at least bints as much in a letter of his which appears in another column, and it would…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law. Supreme Court—(civil Side.)
TUESDAY.—Before His Honor Sir James Howling, and a Common Jury. Pedley v. Green.—This was an action of assumpsit, to recover for goods furnished to the defendant's wife…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SUPREME COURT—Civil Side. Monday, March 11, 1839. (Before the Chief Justice, and Messrs. Kinnear and Lethbridge, Assessors.)
Bury v. Smith.—This was an action to recover the sum of £3 5s. by the plaintiff, a Commission Agent, for the sale of a quantity of salted beef for the defendant, a butcher in George-street. It was…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →