These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
691 stories in Sydney's papers · page 27 of 35
CALCROFT V. LARNOCK.—Mr. A'Beckett, for the defendant, said that although this trial was the second on the list, he must beg his honour to hear him on a motion to postpone the trial, on the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →White v. Eales.--This was an action to recover damages for 1500 head of cattle, which together with the run at Molasco, near Liverpool Plains, were sold to defendant in October 1839,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →SAMPSON [?] LISCOMEE.—This was an action for a breach of contract. For the plaintiff, Messrs. Windeyer, a'Beckett, and Broadhurst, and for the defendant, Messrs. Foster and Darvall…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →NOTICE is hereby given that the following claims for deeds of grant of town allotments, will be ready for the examination of the Commissioners appointed for the purpose, under the Act of…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →CARRINGTON v. HOGUE.—This was an action of assault. The declaration charged the assault in the usual form, to which the defendant hail pleaded not guilty only. The damages were laid…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Cross-examined by Mr. C. Philips.—I have been several times before a magistrate. I do not know how many times. I was also examined before the Coroner. I was not…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Mudie cersus John Kinchela the Younger. This (a special jury case) occupied the Court from ten o'clock in the morning until four in the afternoon. It was an action in which Major…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Mudie v Kinchela.—Mr. Foster opened the pleadings for the plaintiff, by stating the facts of the case; viz., that on the 2nd of September, 1840, the plaintiff, Major Mudie, had been attacked in…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Sampson v. Liscombe.--This was an action to recover damages for a certain number of cattle belonging to plaintiff, which had been sold by the defendant, who is an auctioneer at…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →THE QUEEN ON THE PROSECUTION OF LETTSOM v. BOYD.—This was a criminal information filed in the Queen's Bench side of the Court, against Archibald Boyd, Esquire, for an intent…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →NOTICE is hereby given, that the following claims fur DEEDS of GRANT of TOWN ALLOTMENTS will be ready for the examination of the Commissioners appointed for…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →FRIDAY. — Before his Honor the Chief Justice and a Special Jury. Bell and another v. Lethbridge.—This was an action of trespass beyond the boundaries of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY, 28TH OCTOBER.—Before the Chief Justice and a Special Jury. WALTON AND ANOTHER r. HARPER.—This was an action on promises. Mr. Darvall…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →By Mr. Baron Parke:—Had you not seen these gloves when you examined the linen in the prisoner's box before [?] I had not.—-Had you examiued with sufficient accuracy to see [?]…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →SIR,—Having in two of the public journals of Tuesday last, seen paragraphs, stating, that at the request of the Governor of the Gaol, they publicly acknowledged (and with gratification) the receipt…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The Queen, on the prosscution of Lettsome v. Boyd.—The declaration read by the chief clerk of the court set forth that one Archibald Boyd had, on the 7th March last, written a letter to Captain…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Before His Honor the Chief Justice, and a Special Jury. WALTON AND ANOTHER v. HARPER.—This was an action on a breach of contract. The…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WEDNESDAY, 28TH OCTOBER.—Before the Chief Justice and a Special Jury. SOLOMON AND ANOTHER v. SIMMONS AND OTHERS.—This was an action of special…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →WE call the attention of our readers, more, especially those in the mother-country, to the, following return of the sums which were expen[?] on Police and Gaols from 1st July, 1835, 10 [?]…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The declaration charged the assault, to which the defendant pleaded first, not guilty,—and secondly, that just before the time of the alleged assault, the plaintiff assaulted the defendant. The…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →