Supreme Court.—friday
Before Mr. JUSTICE STEPHEN, Major Smyth, and Captain Steel, Assessors. WILLIAM THURLOW AND CAMPBELL L. MACDONNELL v. WILLIAM HERBLEWHITE…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Courts & crime, 1841
1,053 stories in Sydney's papers · page 20 of 53
Insolvent Debtors' Court.—friday
Before Mr. JUSTICE BURTON. GREEN v. ROBINSON. [?]UGUID v. SAME. The insolvent in these cases was Harold Robinson, who had been remanded in order to…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Extracts. the Murder at Ashton-under-lyne. Trades' Union Co[?]ation
Ashton, Monday Dec. 21.âAs the inquiries into the circumstances attendant upon the late horrible murder of Benjamin Cooper, the sawyer, proceed, the facts that arE clicited tend to…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Supreme Court--civil Side. Tuesday, May 22
BEFORE Mr. Justice Stephen, Major Smyth, and Mr. John Lord, Assessors. Cooper v. Hawkings.--Mr. Windeyer, for the plaintiff, stated that this was an action of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Court of Equity. Before the Chief Justice. Hardir v. Allan and Another
This cause, in which Mr. HUSTLER appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. W. M. MANNING and Mr. BROADHURST for the defendants, was heard yesterday before his Honour the Chief Justice,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court.—Civil Side. Tuesday, May 25. Before Justice Stephen, T. Lord, and Major Smith, Assesors
Cook v. Hawkins.—This was an action to recover £45 13s 6d, the amount of a promissory note, dated 25th of October, 1840, at thre[?] months, drawn by Thomas Vaw[?]er, and…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Police Office, Friday May, 28Th
Patrick Phillips was charged by Mr. Joseph ennings Publican, with having assaulted him. The prosecu er stated that the prisoner was creating a disturbance at Morris' corner of Pitt and…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—saturday. Sittings in Banco
Before the CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. JUSTICE STEPHEN. The SOLICITOR GENERAL moved that Archibald Mechie, Esq., of the Middie Temple, should…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Friday. Before His Honor Mr. Justice Stephen and two Ass ssors
W. Thurlow and Campbell, and Macdonald v. W. Hebblewhite.—A general verdict was in this case returned for the plaintiff. Damages—£120 13s…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Water Police Court
MONDAY.—This Court was thronged yesterday by merchants and others eager to learn the result of the pending case between the Crown and Captain Hewes, master of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Water Police Office
This office was unusually crowded yesterday to hear the termination of the case of the Orwell's mail being detained more than a month after her arrival in this port. A great number of merchants were in…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court, (Equity Side.)
SATURDAY—Before the Chief Justice, and Mr. Justice Stephens. Mr. Foster said this was an application brought before the Court on affidavit, and by…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Government Gazette. Friday, May 28, 1841. Court of Claims
NOTICE is hereby given, that the following claims for deeds of grant of land and town allotments, will be ready for the examination of the Commissioners, at the expiration of two months…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court.—tuesday. Before Mr. Justice STEPHEN and a Common Jury. John Greer v. John Lefevre
This was an action of assumpsit, for work and labour done by the plaintiff for the defendant: the defence was payment. The plaintiff, a stonemason, called Mr. James Hume, the architect of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—monday. Before Mr. Justice Burton, Edmond Lockyer, and J. E. MANNING, Esqrs., Assessors. KING v. ATKINSON
This was an action of assumpsit by the plaintiff as the officer of the Australian Agricultural Company, against the defendant as the endorser of the promissory notes of one Bruce Millar, for…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Water Police Court. MONDAY.—Before Messrs. Browne, Deloitte, and John Campbell. Regina F. HRWES
This was an information charging the defendant with detaining letters. The defendant pleaded not guilty; when the following information was read: Be it remembered that on…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court, (Yesterday.)
Carrick v. Russel—This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the seduction of the plaintiff's daughter We know of no good purpose it would…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court—Civil Side
TUESDAY, JUNE 1.—Before Mr. Justice Stephen and a Common Jury. SEDUCTION, CARRICK v. RUSSELL.—This was an action…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Civil Side.—tuesday, June 1. (Before his Honour Mr. Justice Burton and a common jury.)
Greer v. Lefevre.—This was an action to recover damages for work and labour done by the plaintiff who is a mason and bricklayer. After two witnesses had been examined a verdict was given for the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court,—tuesday, 1st June. Before Mr. Justice Stephen and a Common Jury. Frederick Brook Carrick V. Robert Russel
Mr. WINDEYER opened the pleadings. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL stated the case, and said that he was happy to say that within the four years of his practice at this bar, he had…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →