Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—tuesday
THIRD CIVIL TERM.—SITTINGS AT NISI PRIUS. BEFORE MR. JUSTICE BURTON and a Special Jury. DOE ON THE DEMISE OF HOLT V. W. C…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
1,053 stories in Sydney's papers · page 31 of 53
THIRD CIVIL TERM.—SITTINGS AT NISI PRIUS. BEFORE MR. JUSTICE BURTON and a Special Jury. DOE ON THE DEMISE OF HOLT V. W. C…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →COLONIAL Secretary's Office, Sydney, August [?]th, 1841.—His Excellency the Governor directs [?] to be notified, that on the unanimous recommendation of the Magistrates of the present…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →SIR,--Since I wrote to you last, I read the debate on the Police and Gaol question and I confess I was gratified to see the honourable part taken in the Council in support of the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →HIS Excellency the Governor directs it to be notified, that on the unanimous recommendation of the Magistrates of the present Districts of Campbel[?]own and…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Doe dem. Holt v. Wentworth.—In this case Mr. Foster stated, for the defendant, that the plaintiff had not complied with the rule of court, and he should not file his rule of consent…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Raymond v. Wright.—This was an information filed for the breach of the 18th Clause of 5 Wm. IV., usually known as the Colonial Amended Post Office Act…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Doe Dem Holt v. Francis.—The Plaintiff not having complied with the rule of Court, the defendant refused to file his consent rule, and the Plaintiff was therefore nonsuited…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action on the case against the sheriff: the first count was for a false return to a writ of fieri facias, issued by the plaintiff upon a judgment against two persons of the name of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Wentworth v. Macquoid.—This was an action on the case, and the declaration charged that the defendant had made a false return to a writ of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action upon the defendant's promissory note, for £90 2s. 3d., in favor of the plaintiff, payable in six months after date. The plea was, that the note was made through fraud…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →James Burgess, a shoemaker, from-Barbican, London, was brought before the Bench by the Captain of the Her[?], on a charge of having stowed himself away on board that vessel when…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Lyons v. Lefevre.—In this case which was an action upon a promissory note, for £90 2s. 3d. in favour of the plaintiff, and made payable six months after date, a verdict had been returned for…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The ATTORNEY GENERAL, moved the admission of Mr. Charles S. Macdonagh, who had been admitted in Ireland on Attorney of the Court of Exchequer in Trinity Term, 1830, and…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →IN our paper of the 7th instant, we commenced something in shape of a critical review of the debate in Council on the Police and Gaol question; and our first…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →SIR, Knowing that your columns are open to the complaints of the oppressed, without reference to the quarter from whence the arbitary or…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →THE KING OF HANOVER v. SIR H. WHEATLEY. —The bill in this case was filed by his Majesty the King of Hanover against the defendants, Sir H. Wheatley and T. Wood, the executors…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Peter Hayden, the insolvent in this case, had been several times discharged within the last few weeks, and was now in execution for £156 4s. 5d., being the amount and costs for which the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Francis William Blend and Henry Richard Bowen Tripe pleaded guilty to an assault on Mr. E. B. W. Sandwell, and were each fined £5 to the Queen, which they paid, and were discharged…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Lyons v. Lefevre.—This was an action on the defendant's promissory note for £90 2s. 3d., pay able six months after date, which had been given in payment of certain allotments of land purchased at…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action upon three Bills of Exchange, drawn in London by Thomas Hubbock and Son, accepted by Andrew Liddell and Co., and indorsed by Hubbock and Son to the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →