Supreme Court. Civil Side.—in Equit
TUESDAY. Before Chief Justice Dowling Burdekin v. Lyons and others.—This was a ult brought to obtain a judgment by the plain tiff, Thomas Burdekin, against Saul Lyons…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Courts & crime, 1842
936 stories in Sydney's papers · page 19 of 47
Court of Vice-admiralty. Tuesday. Before Sir James Dowling, Chief Justice
In the case of the Queen v. Cockburn, Mr. WINDEYER gave notice that the defendant would appeal to the High Court of Admiralty. The Court was then adjourned till Tuesday…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Civil Side.—tuesday, May 3, 1842. (Before his Honor Mr. Justice Stephen, with Messrs. Dawson and Moffatt, assessors.)
Gould v. Osborne.—This was an action for work and labour done and for materials supplied. Mr. Windeyer appeared for the plaintiff, the Solicitor General and Mr. Darvall for the defendant…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—equity Side. Tuesday. Before Sir James Dowling, Chief Justice. Burdekin and Others, v. Saul Lyons, Samuel Peek, Joseph Roberts, John Campbell, Francis Mitchell, Alexander Fotheringham, Dalrymple, Fyffe, Carnegie, Robert Glasgow Dunlop, and William Wright
Mr. BROADHURST, who appeared for the plaintiff, stated the case, from which it appeared that his client, Thomas Burdekin, was one of the creditors of John Thomas…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side. Wednesday. Before his Honor Mr. Justice BURTON, and Major SMYTH and Mr. H. O'BRIEN, Assessors. CHOWNE v. CHOWNE
This was an action brought to recover the sum of £94, alleged to be due on a promissory note made by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff. Mr. Windeyer and Mr…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Court Circular
The Queen and Prince Albert arrived at Claremont Park, at five o'clock on Tuesday afternoon, escorted by a party of Hussars from Windsor Castle. The Royal suite followed…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court—civil Side. Wednesday, May 4
Before Mr. Justice Burton and Assessors. ERRATUM.—In our report of the trial Wyer v. Sandeman, we have stated that a verdict was returned on the two first issues for the defendant…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. in Equity--tuesday. (Before His Honor the Chief Justice.) Burdekin and Others, V. Saul Lyons, Samuel Peek, Joseph Roberts, John Campbell. Francis Mitchell, Alexander Fotheringham, Dalrymble, Fyffe, Carnegie, Robert Glasgow, Dunlop, and William Wright
In this case, the plaintiff brought an action to obtain a judgment against the defendant, for the payment over to him of certain monies alledged to be due to him as part of the proceeds of the…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side. Thursday. Before Mr. Justice Burton. Insolvent Business
On the opening of the Court this morning, Mr. Justice Burton expressed his regret that business had been set down for that day, as it was one of the days appointed by the Court to…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Court of Claims
COURT of Claims Office, April 30.—Notice is hereby given, that the following claims for deeds of grant of lands and town allotments will be ready for the examination of the…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Supreme Court.—civil Side. Saturday, May 7. (Before the three Judges.)
The Chief Justice observed, that the Judges had received an application from a gentleman of the name of Hall, praying them to fix a day for a trial in Which he was concerned. His Honor said…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Water Police Office. Saturday. Before Messrs. BROWNE and Deloitte. Breach of the Harbour Act
James Johnson, master of the schooner Nautilus, appeared on a summons, charged by Inspector Rieley, with having on the 2nd day of May last past, entered the Heads of Port…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Court of Quarter Sessions. Monday, May 9, 1842. (Before the Chairman and Captain Hollingsworth.)
John Baker was indicted for stealing £2 6s. 6d. from the person of John Barber, in the Coach and Horses public house, Cumberland-street, on the 2nd March last. Not guilty. Discharged…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side. Saturday. Before the Three Judges in Banco. BRYAN V. POLACK
Mr. WINDEYER in this case shewed cause against a rule which had been obtained on a previons day for an attachment against a party named Henry and his wife, on the ground…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court. Civil Side.—saturday, May 7, 1842. (Before their Honors the three Judges, in bunce.)
Doe dem. Hall v. Pauley.—In this case the Chief Justice said that the judges had received an applition from Mr. Hall, praying them to fix a day for the trial at bar during the present term, but with…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Water Police Office. SATURDAY—MAY 7. Regina, v. James Johnson, Breach of the Harbour Act. Before Captain Browne and Captain Deloitte, J. P's
James Johnson, master of the ship " Nantilus," appeared on a summons, charged by Inspector Reiley, with having, on the 2nd day of May last, entered the heads of Port…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side. Tuesday. Before Judge STEPHEN, and Assessors Dr.LOITTE and Captain Steele. Bloomfield V. RAPER
This was an action brought to recover the amount of £21 l6s. 9d., the amount of a builder's account, for work done by the plaintiff for the defendant…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—equity Side
THOMAS SMITH v. ARTHUR WILLINGTON ELYARD. His Honor Sir JAMES DOWLING, delivered the following judgment in the above case. This was a bill, filed on the 26th November,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court.—civil Side. Wednesday. Before the Chief Justice and Assessors. BROKER V. WHATELEY
This was an action brought to recover £52 4s, alleged to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff, for the work and labour of the latter as a journeyman butcher. Mr. Fisher…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—in Banco. Thursday. Ex-parte G. R. Nicholis
THIS motion, which was on the paper for the day, the object of which was to call on the licensing magistrates to shew cause why they excluded the applicant from the magistrate's…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →