Court for the Trial of Disputed Elections
As announced in last week's Register, this court was convened by his Excellency on Wednesday last, the members being Archibald Michie, Esq., President, and…
Continued on Trove, page 29 →Courts & crime, 1843
611 stories in Sydney's papers · page 20 of 31
Domestic Intelligence Sydney Court of General Quarter Sessions
BEFORE the Chairman, Major SMYTH, and [?] Common Jury. John Mack, guilty of stealing loaf [?] twelve months to an iron-gang…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Legislative Council. Court for Trial of Disputed Elections
THE members of this Court assembled at nine o'clock on Saturday morning, at the Legislative Council Chambers, for the pu[?]pose of proceeding with the case of Mr. R[?]bert…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor Mr. Justice BURTON, and —GOSLING and J. STIRLING, Esquires, Assessors. SMITH v. VARDY…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Legislative Council. Court for the Trial of Disputed Elections
THIS Court met yesterday, at the Council Chambers, Macquarie-street, when the PRESIDENT delivered the following decision:- "The Court convened by His Excellency…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—equity Side
BEFORE His Honor the CHIEF JUSTICE EXPATE JOHNSON v. PHILLIPS. Mr. MICHIE appealed on the part of the complainant, for a decree of foreclosure in…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor Mr. Justice STEPHEN, and Alderman WILSHIRE and Captain STEELE, Assessors. Mr. W. C. WENTWORTH, who was present in…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Supreme Court
The Attorney-General v. Nash.--This was an action on the part of the Crown to recover possession of a certain portion of land in King-street, hitherte in the possession of the defendant. It was proved that…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Newcastle Gaol. To the Editors of the Sydney Morning Herald
GENTLEMEN,—In reply to the letter of a "Sufferer" in your excellent journal of the 9th inst., I would beg leave to correct a few essential errors which your correspondent…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE his Honor Mr. Justice BURTON, and Captain JOHNSTON and Dr. MITCHELL, Assessors. HART V. YOUNG…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor the CHIEF JUSTICE and a common Jury. JURORS FINED. The following gentlemen were fined £2…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Papers Printed by Order of the Legislative Council. Water Police Act
DESPATCH from Lord Stanley to Sir George Gipps. (No. 187.) Downing-street, 16th September, 1842…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor the CHIEF JUSTICE, and a Common Jury. LYNCH AND ANOTHER, V. COOPER. This was an action brought by the plaintiffs,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor Mr. Justice BURTON and a Common Jury. WALKER AND OTHERS [?] WOOLLEY AND ANOTHER. This was an action brought by the plaintiffs,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Supreme Court. Civil Side
AUGUST 23.—Before Mr. Justice Burton and a Common Jury. Walker and others v. Woolley.—This was an action of debt upon an account stated. After the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →New South Wales. "Water Police Act, 4 Victoria, No. 17
DESPATCH from Lord Stanley, to Sir George Gipps, transmitted to The Legislative, Council, with Message from The Governor with Water Police Act…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Domestic Intelligence. Second Half-yearly Police Report
AT a Meeting of the Police Committee, held in the Town Hall, on Monday, the 31st July, 1843, consisting of Mr. Alderman Broughton, Messsrs. Councillors…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFORE His Honor Mr. Justice STEPHEN and a Special Jury. JURORS FINED. The following gentlemen were fined £5…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BFFORF his Honor Mr. Justice STEPHEN and a Special Jury. JURORS FINED. The following gentlemen were fined £5…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Law Intelligence. Supreme Court.—civil Side
BEFOER His Honor Mr. Justice BURTON and a Special Jury. FLOWER v. GROSE. This was an action brought by the plainliff,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →