Water Police Court
BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate and Captain Deloitte. John Williams, a labourer, who has been remanded several times, he having been brought before the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
2,728 stories in Sydney's papers · page 17 of 137
BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate and Captain Deloitte. John Williams, a labourer, who has been remanded several times, he having been brought before the…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE Mr. Forbes. Mr. Murnin, Mr. G. Hill, Mr. Egan, and Mr. R. Hill. Nine drunkards were sentenced to pay 20s. each, or to be imprisoned for twenty-four hours…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Nine persons were convicted of drunkenness:—Edward Norcombe was ordered to pay a fine of 20s., or to be imprisoned for forty-eight hours. The rest were sentenced to pay 20s. each, or be locked up for twenty-four…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →On Saturday, the 7th instant, at 7 o'clock p.m., Mr. Dillon, district constable of Burrowa, got a slight hint that there had been a murder committed at Thorsly's Creek, half-way between Yass and Burrowa. Mr. Dillon…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE the Chief Commissioner of Insolvent Estates. In the estate of Richard W. Goodall, a first meeting. Nothing done. In the estate of Gollan, Mackenzie, and Co., a…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE the Commissioner and Two Assessors. COHEN V. BERKLEMAN and BATE: This was an action to recover a sum of £20, amount of a dishonoured cheque drawn by the defendants in favor of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE Mr. Justice Dickinson and Mr. Justice Milford. ADMISSION OF BARRISTERS. The following gentlemen were, upon the motion of…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →In the estate of Richard Wright Goodall a first meeting. The insolvent who resides in Maitland did not attend. No creditors appeared and nothing was done. In the estate of Gollan Mackenzie, and C.., a second meeting…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →On the motion of the Attorney-General, John F. Hargrave, Esq., M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge, a member of the English bar, (called in Hilary term, 1841,) was admitted a barrister of the Supreme Court…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →This was an action on a dishonoured cheque drawn upon the Bank of New South Wales by the defendants, in favour of the plaintiff, Philip J. Cohen. The cheque named a sum of &20. It was presented…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Eight persons were convieted of hearing beeen drank in the streets:—There women were [?] to pay 20s, each or to be impressoned for forty-eight [?]; and fire [?] to pay 20s, each or be locked up for…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE Mr. Forbes. Nine drunkards were convicted, with the usual result. Ann Adams and Bridget Murray were brought…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate, and Mr. M'Lean, J.P. Twelve seamen belonging to the emigrant ship Hindostan were convicted of continued disobedience,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Barnard Daler being [?] ofr the support of his child, the [?] of [?] by [?] for 6 months, from…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE the Chief Commissioner of Insolvent Estates. In the estate of Harold C. Smith, an adjourned certificate meeting. Mr. Faucett examined insolvent at some length, in reference to conversations, in England,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →In the [?] of [?] service [?] meeting. Mr. [?] [?] is reference to a [?] with [?] Co., with [?] to [?]…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →SIR,—In your issue of the 17th instant appears a letter addressed by Mr. N. P. Bayly, to J. Robertson, Esq., M.P., expressive of the writer's dissent from the proposed plan for the amalgamation of the offices of…
Continued on Trove, page 8 →This was action brenght by a ticker [?] racers £20, the price cf two [?] leag, and defrered eeto the [?] [?]…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate. Martha Henley, convicted of drunkenness, was fined 10s., and Arthur Bristol, convicted of drunkenness and using obscene language, was fined 40s., with the…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →BEFORE Mr. Arkins and Mr. Eliott. LIBEL. MOORE V. WRIGHT. This was a prosecution for an alleged libel, published…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →