These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
2,249 stories in Sydney's papers · page 16 of 113
NICHOLS v. WELLS.—This was an action for the recovery of £11 15s. for advertisements published in the Sportsman's Calendar for 1857, of which the plaintiff is proprietor. The plaintiff produced the book…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →George Vidler, of Five DooK, publican, Liabilities, £1180 4[?]. Assets real property, £600; personal property and moneys,£5; debts due, £38. Amount of deficiency, £487 4s. Offcial assignee, Mr. J. p…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Oh the motion of the Chief Commissioner certificates of discharge were confirmed to the following persons: —George Myers, Jeremiah Lethbridge, Alexander Frederick David Greville, John Mackenzie, Peter…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →On the motion of the Chief Commissioner, certificates of discharge were confirmed to the following persons:— George Myers, Jeremiah Lethridge, Alexander Fredarick David Greville, John Mackoazie, Peter Farrell,…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →This is a suit for wages by the master, instituted under the "Merchant Shipping Act of 1854" against the vessel. It appears that the voyage was by the ship's articles, to terminate in England; but, under…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate and Mr. G. Eliott. Catherine Levy and Mary Ann Nesbitt were fined for drunkenness, 40s. each, in default of payment to be…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE Mr. Forbes, Mr. Ronald, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Cooper, and Captain M'Lean. Twenty-eight drunkards were fined, according to circumstances, in penalties varying from 10s. to 40s…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →(Before the Police Magistrate, Folix Wilson, Rowand Ronald, Thomas Cooper, S. Lyons, and J. MoLean, Esquires,) DRUNKENNESS.—Twenty.five persons were brought…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE the Chief Commissioner of Insolvent Estates. In the estate of Joseph and Weil, a second meeting. Six debts were proved, Mr. W. Drynan was elected creditors assignee, and insolvent was examined by Mr…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The Court first disposed of the fines imposed on several persons for non-attendance as witnesses, &c., in the usual manner. DEVINE V. WILSON AND OTHERS…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →BEFORE the full Court. FINES AND ESTREATS. The schedules of fines and estreats were gone through and disposed of in the ordinary manner…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →In the estate of Daniel O'Roilly, a single meeting was held, at which the insolvent was present. Three debts were proved, and the meeting was adjourned to Friday next, at 10 a.m., for examination as to a cheque for £[?]…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Caroline Dunn, who appeared on summons, was charged with having used insulting language towards complainant, Christina London, who also stated that she threw a handful of dust into her face. Fined 10s.,…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →DRUNKARDS.—Margaret Munroe, Thomas Downs, and Barney, an aboriginal, charged with being drunk in the streets, were each fined 10s., in default, to be imprisoned for twenty-four hours. William Gilmore, for being drunk…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →DRUNKENNESS.—Eight individuals were brought up on the charge of drunkenness, and severally sentenced to pay the usual fine of 10s., or in default to be imprisoned for four-and-twenty hours…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →NEW TRIAL MOTIONS.—This Day, 24th February.— Devine and another v. Wilson and others (part heard); Clift v. Nowland; Nicholson v. Healy; Nicholson v. Healy; Elliott and others v. Rusden; Ni[?]cholson v…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Seven persons, convicted of having been fonnd drunk in the street, were severally sentenced to pay 10s., or to be imprisoned twenty-fonr hours. William Matthews, who was yesterday committed…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →Sir AL[?]RED STEPHEN, C.J., delivered the judgment of the Court in this case as follows:— The declaration in this case stated, that the defendant at the several times thereinafter mentioned was [?]…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →The argument in this case was resumed. The question for argument was, whether the affidavits filed by the plaintiff as to the partiality and bias of three of the jurors showed sufficient ground for granting a new…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →In the estate of John Tucker, a second meeting. Three debts were proved. In the estate of Henry O. Thompson, a first meeting. A small claim was proved, and insolvent was examined…
Continued on Trove, page 4 →