These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
3,328 stories in Sydney's papers · page 64 of 167
BANCO COURT.—M'Lellan v. Linsley; Morgan and others v. Samuel and another; Starkey v. Battley. JURY COURT. Toogood v. Lonergan; Corner v. Penson; Manefield v. the Mayor and others; Mackenzie…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →Susan Wright was sent to gaol for one month; and Mary O'Neill for fourteen days, for being idle and disorderly characters. William Taylor was fined 20s., or one month to gaol,…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →BEFORE the Water Police Magristrate, with Messrs. J. B. Smithers and Walter Lamb. William Borrett, seagian of the John Duthie, charged with disobedience of lawful commands, was sentenced to be…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE their Worships the Police Magistrate, Messrs. Parce, Daugar, Bossley, and Cohen. Of twenty-nine Prisoners brought before the Court, fifeen were discharged, and two were remanded…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Before his Honor Mr. Justice FAUCETT. SENTENCES. ROBBERY WITH FIREARMS. James Booth, William Willis, alias Dunkely, and Thomas…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE his Honor Mr. Justice FAUCETT and a jury of four. TOOGOOD V. LONERGAN. This was an action upon a promissory note for £142 10s,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The following estates were surendersd:- Elizabeth Hosking, of Liverpool, widow, Liabilities, £65 8s. Id. Assets, £25. Deficiency, £40 3s. Ld. Mr. Sempill, offiial assignce…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →BEFORE the CHIEF COMMISSIONER. In the matter of Prost, Kohler, and Co., ex parte Jacobus Cornelius Prost, and adjourned certificate meeting. His HONOR delivered judgment as follows:—…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →BEFORE his Honor Mr. Justice CHEEKE. SENTENCES. CONCRALING THE BIRTH OF A CHILD. Ellen Drayton, who on arringment pleaded guilty to an…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Ellen Drayton, concealment of birth, was sentenced to six months imprisonment in Mailtland gaol. His Honor, in passing sentence, spoke of the offence as being a serious one, but that the medical evidence went to…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →JURY COURT.—Corner v. Penson; Manstiled v. the Mayor and others; Mackenzie and another v. Samuel and another; the Attorney-General v. Burnby; Malcolm v. Harris. BANCO COURT.—Morgan and others v. Samuel and another;…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Rooney, the pawnbroker, convicted of receiving stolen watches, was sentenced to three years hard labour. Booth, for the Singleton mail robery, was sentenced…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →This was an action for malicious prosecutio, in which the defendant had charged the plaintiff with having set fire to certain premises (occupied by the latter) on the South head Road; and had caused him…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →This was an action upon a promissory note for £142 10s., dated 20th July, 1865, made by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff, payable in three months. The defendant pleaded payment of £20 and sale to…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →Sarah White was fined 1Os., or forty-eight hours' imprisenment; and Mary Haddocks, 2Os., or seven days to gaol, for making use of obsecene language in public places…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →Samuel Herbert, grocer, Rushcutter's Bay, was fined 2Os and costs 8s. 6d., for having light weights in his possession. John M'Nulty was fined 10s., for riotous behaviour…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →BEFORE their Worships the Police Magistrate, and Messrs. Caldwell and Kettle. Of ten prisoners brought before the Court, one svas discharged and another was remanded…
Continued on Trove, page 13 →BEFORE the Water Police Magistrate, with Mr. H.H. VOSS, and Mr. T. Dangar. John M'Nully, for riotous behaviour on the South Head Road, was fined 10s, or to be imprisoned forty-eight…
Continued on Trove, page 13 →SOME idea of the buildings which it is intended to erect upon the ground recently enclosed on the north side of the original gaol at Darlinghurst, to give additional accommodation for prisoners was given in our…
Continued on Trove, page 9 →Before his Honor the CHIEF JUSTICE and jury of four. MORGAN AND OTHERS V. SAMUEL AND ANOTHER. This was an action by William Morgan of Adelaide (trading as William Morgan and Co.) and the Trustees of…
Continued on Trove, page 13 →