These are historical newspapers. Some stories use language and express views that are offensive today.
3,150 stories in Sydney's papers · page 59 of 158
POLICE OBSTRUCTION ON BOARD SHIP' GENTOO.— Daniel Bradford, master of the United States ship Crusader, oppeared on summons to onswer an information that he did, on the 16th instant, wilfully obstruct Joseph Camphin,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →Three drunkards were fined in the usual [?] nalties. A[?] Wee was charged with hawking without a license on the 19th May. Defendant was [?] by constable Kinsolla hawking articles of china, fans, ton,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →DRUNKARDS.—Catherine Collins, Catherine Tester, Johanna Hunt, Jane Pataude, and James Richards, were fined for being drunk and disorderly. Mary Sutton, for indecent exposure, fined 20s., or fourteen…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Of sixteen persons brought in custody before the Bench, two were dismissed and one was remanded. One person was fined 5s., two were fined 10s, each, and four were fined 20s. each, the offences being drunkenness…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →The special case, Re[?]ina v. T. J. Griffin, reserved by his Honor Mr. Justice Lutwyche from the Rockhampton assizes, held on March 16, for the consideration of the full Court, was decided in the Supreme…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →BANCO COURT.—Sims v. Travers; Weddersburn v. Cohen; Metcalfe v. Dent; Freehill v. Syer; Treeve v. Glass. JURY COURT—Guiness v. Joshua. MASTER'S OFFICE.—At 10.30: Godfrey v. Grimstone, minutes…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →In the estate of Gilfillan and Co., a second meeting. Eleven debts were proved, and one stands over for payment of stamp duty and fine on a bill produced. In the estate of John Garry, a single meeting. Some…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →In the estate of R. Gilfillan and Co., second meeting. The insolvent, Robert Gilfillan, was sworn and did not amend his joint estate schedule, nor that of his separate estate. Eleven debts were proved; one to stand…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →This action was resumed and concluded. The plaintiff was Mr. Henry Prince, treasurer of the New South Wales Cotton Growing Compnny. The defendant was Mr. John Rober'son Nowlan, a…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →HUGHES V REDDIN.—In this case plaintiff obtained a verdict for £5 10s. CRONIN V. O'NEILL—This was a claim for work and labout done by plaintiff for defendant, namely,…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Plaintiff claimed £5 8s. for goods sold and delivered. Defendant filed a set-off to the amount of £7 5s. Of this, £4 10s. was for a saddle lent by the defendant to the plaintiff. His Honor allowed the defendant to withdraw…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action upon a promissory note for £200, to which defendent had pleaded that the note sued upon had been endorsed to plaintiff by one Moses without consideration; Moses having previously declared such note to have…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →This was an action upon a promissory note for £200 The defendant pleaded that the note sued [?] on had been endorsed to plaintiff by one Moses, without consideration, Moses having previously declared such note…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →This was a special cape, reserved by his Honor Mr. Justice Lutwyche from the Rockhampton assizes, held on March 10, for the consideration of the full Court. The Attorney-General and Mr. Lilley, Q.C., appeared for…
Continued on Trove, page 5 →The investigation of the charge against Daniel Bradford, master of the ship Crusader, for obstructing the police on board the United States ship Gentoo, on the 16th instant, was resumed to-day. Mr. Rogers, instructed by Mr. Greer,…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →John Sam appeared by his attorney to answer a charge of perjury laid against him by Yung Chow. The prosecutor did not appear, and the case was dismissed…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Joseph Bryant, Benjamin [?] James Charles Diamond, Robert Atkins, Loftus Sinnett, Elizabeth Smith, Ellen Smith, Eliza Masten, John B[?]er, William Henry Lloyd, and Sarah Dado were punished for…
Continued on Trove, page 3 →Twenty-six prisoners were brought bofore the Court. Of these eight were discharged and two were remanded. Thomas Smith was charged with loitering in a publicplace with intent to commit a felony. Constable Hondren…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →ln re Byrne v. Donoughy, a rule nisi for compulsory sequestration, no person attending on behalf of the petitioner, the rule was dismissed with costs. In re Ashworth v. Battye, a rule nisi, time to show cause…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →In re Edward Byrne v. Robert Donoughey: This was a petition for compulsory sequestration, called on under rule nisi granted 7th instant. The petition was called on, but there was no attendance of petitioner…
Continued on Trove, page 2 →